- Given performance data, select and compute appropriate
performance status indicators.
- Given performance data, detect and analyze the impact
of significant problem areas, based on the status indicators.
- Given performance data, calculate an estimate of cost
at completion.
- Recognize the importance of Earned Value data in
external reporting.
1. There
are various performance status indicators used in earned value management to
tell whether a program is on track or not.
Budgeted Cost of Work Scheduled
(BCWS)
indicates the value of work planned
to be accomplished or planned value.
Budgeted Cost of Work Performed
(BCWP)
indicates the value of work
accomplished or the earned value.
Actual Cost of Work Performed (ACWP)
indicates the cost of work
accomplished or actual cost.
Schedule Variance (SV)
equals the difference between the
work accomplished the value of work accomplished to the value of work planned
to be accomplished. It is calculated by subtracting the budgeted cost of work
scheduled from the budgeted cost of work performed or earned value:
SV
= BCWP : BCWS
A negative schedule variance in
dollars is unfavorable and indicates that less work was accomplished than
planned, while a positive schedule variance shows that more work was
accomplished than planned. The program's critical path schedule must be
reviewed to determine the impact of these schedule variances to the program.
Cost Variance (CV)
indicates whether the work
accomplished cost more or less than planned. It is calculated by subtracting
the actual cost of work performed from the budgeted cost of work performed:
CV
= BCWP : ACWP
A negative cost variance in dollars
is unfavorable and indicates that more money was spent for the work
accomplished than was planned. This has the potential to put the program over
budget if the trend continues, and may require the government to provide
additional money to complete the program. A positive cost variance is favorable
and indicates that the work accomplished cost less than planned.
2. We can also identify performance
trends to see whether performance is improving or worsening over time and at
what rate. This can be done for the overall program or for a specific activity
within the program.
Schedule Performance Index (SPI)
indicates the efficiency with which
the work has been accomplished in comparison to a specific value of work
planned. For example, we may be functioning at only 0.8 or 80% efficiency of what
we had planned to accomplish. It is calculated by dividing the budgeted cost of
work performed by the budgeted cost of work scheduled:
SPI
= BCWP/BCWS
Cost Performance Index (CPI)
tells the cost efficiency. It
compares the value of work that has been accomplished to the actual cost of the
accomplished work. For example, if our CPI is 0.75, we are accomplishing only
75 cents worth of work for every dollar we spend. It is calculated by dividing
the budgeted cost of work performed by the actual cost of work performed:
CPI
= BCWP/ACWP
Ideal CPI for a project is 1.0. Any
activity with a CPI of less than 1.0 will rarely be improved over time. In
fact, a program's CPI performance of less than 1.0 is often non-recoverable.
Cumulative CPIs and SPIs are usually
less than 1.0 for most programs. Current period SPIs and CPIs for individual
tasks can exceed 1.0, and exhibit positive and negative elements. When
cumulative performance (CPI and SPI) fall below 1.0, the government needs to
discuss the performance status with the contractor as part of risk management.
Earned Value industry guidelines specifically state that management reserve
will NOT be used to offset negative variances.
3. Budget at Completion (BAC)
is the sum of all authorized budgets for the contract scope of work. The
project's scope of work forms the performance measurement baseline (PMB), which
projects the cost to do the entire program. The BAC equals the sum of all the
allocated budgets plus any undistributed budget (management reserve and
profit/fee not included).We use the BAC to determine the percent of the program
spent and completed.
Percent Spent
: indicates how much of the program
funds have been spent to date relative to the total amount of the project's
budgeted funds. It is calculated by dividing the actual cost of work performed
by the total amount expected to be spent on the program, the budget at
completion:
%
Spent = ACWP/BAC
Percent Complete --
indicates how much of the total
program has been completed to date relative to the total amount of work to be
performed. It is calculated by dividing the dollar amount of work performed to
date, the budgeted cost of work performed, by the total amount expected to be
spent on the program, the budget at completion:
%
Complete = BCWP/BAC
Percent Scheduled :
indicates where the program should
be based on a point in time. It is calculated by dividing the dollar amount of
work scheduled to date, the budgeted cost of work scheduled, by the total about
expected to be spent on the program, the budget at completion:
%
Scheduled = BCWS/BAC
If the Percent Spent is greater than
the Percent Complete, the program is going to run out of funds before the end
of the project if it continues on the current trend. Conversely, if the Percent
Complete is greater than or equal to the Percent Spent, the project has
sufficient funds if it continues on the current trend. For example, if the
percent complete is 50% and percent spent is 66%, we know we have a problem
because we are spending at a faster rate than the project's work is being
completed.
Note: don't confuse Percent Spent
and Percent Complete with the SPI and CPI. Percent Complete and Percent Spent
indicate program status, looking at the entire program from beginning
to end. SPI and CPI indicate efficiency trends and look at a program
up to a certain point in time.
4. Estimate
at Completion (EAC) is the 'current' estimate of what the program will cost
when completed. The EAC is based on the actual cost of work performed to date
plus an estimate of the work remaining. It is calculated by adding the actual
cost of work performed to the estimated cost to complete the remaining work of
the program.
EAC
= ACWP + Estimated Cost to Complete
The EAC can be calculated as
follows: EAC is equal to the ACWP plus the BAC minus the BCWP divided by a
performance factor such as the product of the CPI and SPI.
EAC
= ACWP + [(BAC : BCWP)/(CPI x SPI)]
Both the Government and the
contractor calculate EACs. The contractor's EAC is often referred to as the
Latest Revised Estimate (LRE).
5. To Complete Performance Index for the Budget at Completion {TCPI(BAC)} shows what efficiency is required to accomplish the remaining work within the contract budget. This index attempts to quantify the efficiency required to deliver the project within the authorized funds for the remainder of the project.
The TCPI is correlated with the
cumulative CPI; it takes the cost efficiency experienced to date, as reflected
by the cumulative CPI, and determines what level of performance efficiency will
be required to complete the project within available budget. If the cumulative
CPI is 0.8 or 80%, in order to stay within our budget, we must achieve a
performance factor of 1.2, or work at an efficiency of 120% for all the
remaining work in order to complete the project at the BAC. This means the
contractor must work 40% more efficiently than its current cumulative CPI of
80%.
To calculate TCPI (BAC) we divide
the value of the work remaining by the value of the budget remaining. In other
words, we subtract the BCWP from the BAC then divide that difference by the
difference between the BAC and the ACWP.
TCPI
(BAC) = BAC - BCWP
BAC - ACWP
BAC - ACWP
The TCPI can also be based on an EAC
which is most often used to validate the contractor or government EAC. DoD
analysts have determined that after 20% into a program, the cumulative CPI
rarely improves. Therefore, achieving a TCPI that is greater than 5% of the CPI
is unlikely; this means we may have to restructure the program in order to
obtain an executable program.
No comments:
Post a Comment